 |
Beating
the Odds
How
one contractor ignores naysayers and completed two complex and grueling
bores
by
Sharon M. Bueno
In
any field, there are always projects that come along that people
take a look at and say, "It can't be done.
In
those instances, many folks elect to take a pass - why should they
put their time and effort into something like that.
That
was the case in Pittsburgh, Pa., last summer.
Mellon
Bank, located in the always congested downtown Pittsburgh, is in
the process of constructing a new 14-story skyscraper--the Mellon
Client Services Center--about 900 ft (272m) or the equivalent of
three city blocks from its existing building.
Workers
watch as the American Augers DD-6 is lowered into the elevator
shaft.
|
A
portion of an old concrete foundation that obstructed drilling
is jackhammered for removal
|
The
pilot hole for the second bore is drilled
|
When
the time came to connect the two buildings with fiber optic cable
to hook up the computer system, there was only one option that
wouldn't tear up the city streets and sidewalks or impede pedestrians
and vehicle traffic: directional Drilling.
But
employing directional drilling in this case was no easy feat. The
project--which would consist of two challenging bores--posed several
heady problems for would be contractors--problems that inevitably
chased all but one away.
Of
primary concern was drilling the pilot hole from inside the basement
of the new building to the existing building. This means lowering
a drill rig into the basement--and lifting it out once the job was
finished. A challenge beyond the drilling. At the other end, a hole
would have to be made in the basement wall so that the bundle of
seven 4-in. (100-mm) SDR 11 HDPE conduit could pass between the
buildings. Also of concern was removal of the drilling fluid because
of the basement location.
And,
oh yeah, don't disrupt the timeline set by the project owner, Mellon
Bank, and project developer, Gilbane Properties. The building is
scheduled for completion this December.
Piece
of cake.
Tom
and Jason Hockran--the father/son team that make up H&H Enterprises
in Andover Ohio--believed they could do this job. And do it well.
"There
were a lot of people who were skeptical that it could be done."
Jason Hockran said. "There was too much risk involved."
Simply
put, people thought the Hockrans were crazy to try it.
"I
took one look at it and thought, "'Man, why would they bother.'"
said Jay Miller, sales manager for INROCK Guidance Systems who handled
the steering and guidance systems on the second bore. INROCK supplied
the steering and drilling tools for the project.
From
a guidance standpoint, this would prove to be an extremely difficult
job for INROCK because of the tight curves that would have to be
made.
"When
I actually saw the job, I didn't think it could be done," Miller
said.
For
the job, the Hockrans chose an American Augers DD-6 drill. Because
the rig was brand new, H&H was trained on it on-site by DJ Miller
of American Augers, who drilled the first bore. Arrangements were
made for a crane to lower the 23,000-lb (102-kN) rig some 45 ft
(13.5m) through an elevator shaft to position it in the basement
to drill the pilot hole for the first bore. INROCK supplied a Black
Max 3 3/4-in. (94-mm) mud motor and a Tensor steering tool system
with TruTracker to drill this crossing.
This
bore--850 ft (257.5m)--would be made through the basement's 3-ft
(1-m) thick wall. Ground conditions for the bore were solid rock--soft
sandstone. The pilot hole was 5 1/4 in. (131mm) in diameter and
would later be enlarged to 22 in. (550mm) for the conduit. After
the pilot bore reached the existing building, a 30-in (750-mm) hole
was made in the basement's wall so the bundle of conduit could pass
through.
INROCK
technicians brought the drill bit within 6 in (150mm) of the planned
exit point. After three days, the pilot bore was done.
Problems
surfaced when the pilot hole was being enlarged. About 720 ft (218m)
into the first pre-ream, the 12 1/4-in. (306-mm) mill tooth hole
opener hit a steel obstruction that was later determines to be an
old steel pylon. The hole opener the Hockrans were using couldn't
cut the steel, so they rented a 12- and 22-in. (300- and 550-mm)
mill reamer from Baker Hughes Oil Tools. It took five days of tripping
in and out of the hole to complete the milling of the steel.
For
the removal of the drilling fluid, H&H chose an American Augers
MCM 1800 recycling system and employed some ingenuity. Of primary
concern were possible frac-outs into other basements and containing
the fluid in the existing building.
To
solve the latter problem, the Hockrans rented two twin 27 vac trucks
from UVAC Inc. to suck out the fluid from the second basement level
of the old building. The trucks were connected by two 6-in. (150-mm)
hose liners, which ran along the same path as the conduit. A temporary
tank was constructed at the exit hole to contain the fluid.
Bore
#2
The
second bore, drilled by Tom Hockran, was launched from a vacant
lot and traveled 450 ft (136m) to the second basement level of the
existing building. To onlookers, this bore may not have the visual
drama of lowering a drill rig into an elevator shaft, it was nonetheless
as complicated.
This
bore consisted of very tight, extreme curves that were precisely
navigated by Jay Miller, who was on-site for this portion of the
job. The bore was drilled in an S-shaped curve between buildings.
The turns consisted of 26 degrees on a 250-st (76-m) radius to the
right and 26 degrees on a 300-ft (91-m) radius to the left to get
to the existing building.
While
drilling the pilot hole, the crew went about 8 ft (2.5m) when it
hit the concrete foundation of an old building. The obstruction,
about 2 ft (.5m) thick, was removed using a jackhammer. The next
day, the crew drilled about 80 ft (24m) when another obstruction
was hit Magnetic indicators showed it to be made of steel.
"Our
concern was that it may have been a pipeline." Jay Miller said.
It
wasn't. The obstruction was determined to be a steel support beam,
which as Jay Miller stated "we hit dead in the middle" with a 5
1/4-in (131mm) TCI tricone drill bit. A Black Max 3 3/4-in. (94-mm)
mud motor was also used.
The
beam was cut and a 30-in. (750-mm) steel casing was installed to
protect the conduit during the pullback. Unlike the first bore, a
mud motor was not used to get through the basement wall (the Hockrans
didn't want to pump any more drilling fluid into the foundation.)
Instead,
a mark was placed on the wall where the drill head was supposed
to exit and a 12-in. (300-mm) test hole was drilled into the wall
to find it. How successful was the bore?
"It
was right where Jay [Miller] said it would be." Jason Hockran said.
Once
the hole was placed in the basement foundation, the conduits were
snaked through the building and attached to the end of the drill
stem. Because of hole instability, the Hockrans decided to trail
rods behind the reamers on the first pass. However, about 85 percent
of the way back, the rods stopped moving: the back of the swivel
had come unscrewed from the back of the reamer, leaving 350 ft (106m)
of rods in the ground.
H&H
had two choices to retrieve the rods: winch them out by hand or
rent a fishing tool to snag and pull the pipe back through the hole.
The latter option was chosen. H&H rented an overshot bit from
Baker Hughes Oil Tools and Tom Hockran fished out the stranded pipe
and reeled it back in.
And
they were done. H&H was awarded this job in July 1999. Drilling
for the first bore started on Aug. 31, 1999 and it was completed
Sept. 29. The second bore finished up at the end of October.
Looking
back on the job, the Hockrans and Jay Miller said they never had
an experience quite like this.
"It
was a real mental challenge. You had to be creative," Miller said.
"Hats off to the Hockrans to coordinate all of this."
"It
was interesting to say the least," Jason Hockran said.
Sharon
M. Bueno is managing editor of Directional Drilling.
|